ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the sociodemographic and psychological factors influencing the continuity of treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods A total of 277 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. 2020 to Mar. 2021 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: non-dialysis group (n=102), hemodialysis (HD) group (n=108), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=67). All patients were investigated by online and offline questionnaires, including self-designed basic situation questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The general sociodemographic data, anxiety and depression of the 3 groups were compared, and the influence of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the interruption or delay of treatment was analyzed by binary logistic regression model. Results There were significant differences in age distribution, marital status, occupation, medical insurance type, caregiver type, whether there was an urgent need for hospitalization and whether treatment was delayed or interrupted among the 3 groups (all P0.05). The average SAS score of 65 PD patients was 38.15+/-15.83, including 53 (81.5%) patients without anxiety, 7 (10.8%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (7.7%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. The average SAS score of 104 patients in the HD group was 36.86+/-14.03, including 81 (77.9%) patients without anxiety, 18 (17.3%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (4.8%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. There were no significant differences in the mean score of SAS or anxiety severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The mean SDS scores of 65 PD patients were 53.42+/-13.30, including 22 (33.8%) patients without depression, 21 (32.3%) patients with mild depression, and 22 (33.8%) patients with moderate to severe depression. The mean SDS scores of 104 patients in the HD group were 50.79+/-10.76, including 36 (34.6%) patients without depression, 56 (53.8%) patients with mild depression, and 12 (11.6%) patients with moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in mean SDS scores or depression severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The results of intra-group comparison showed that the incidence and severity of depression were higher than those of anxiety in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education level (odds ratio OR=5.618, 95% confidence interval CI) 2.136-14.776, P0.01), and unmarried (OR=6.916, 95% CI 1.441-33.185, P=0.016), divorced (OR= 5.588, 95% CI 1.442-21.664, P=0.013), urgent need for hospitalization (OR=8.655, 95% CI 3.847-19.476, P0.01) could positively promote the continuity of treatment in maintenance dialysis patients under the regular epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. In the non-dialysis group, no sociodemographic and psychological factors were found to be associated with the interruption or delay of treatment (P0.05). Conclusion Education, marital status, and urgent need for hospitalization are correlated with the continuity of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance dialysis.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: COVID 19 and increasing unmet needs of health technology had accelerated an adoption of digital health globally and the major categories are mobile-health, health information technology, telemedicine. Digital health interventions have various benefit on clinical efficacy, quality of care and reducing healthcare costs. The objective of the study is to identify new reimbursement policy trend of digital health medical devices in South Korea. Method(s): Official announcements published in national bodies and supplementary secondary research were used to capture policies, frameworks and currently approved products since 2019. Result(s): With policy development, several digital health devices and AI software have been introduced as non-reimbursement by utilizing new Health Technology Assessment (nHTA) pathway including grace period of nHTA and innovative medical devices integrated assessment pathway. AI based cardiac arrest risk management software (DeepCARS) and electroceutical device for major depressive disorders (MINDD STIM) have been approved as non-reimbursement use for about 3 years. Two digital therapeutics for insomnia and AI software for diagnosis of cerebral infarction were approved as the first innovative medical devices under new integrated assessment system, and they could be treated in the market. In addition, there is remote patient monitoring (RPM) reimbursement service fee. Continuous glucose monitoring devices have been reimbursed for type 1 diabetes patients by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) since January 2019. Homecare RPM service for peritoneal dialysis patients with cloud platform (Sharesource) has been reimbursed since December 2019, and long-term continuous ECG monitoring service fee for wearable ECG monitoring devices (ATpatch, MEMO) became reimbursement since January 2022. Conclusion(s): Although Korean government has been developed guidelines for digital health actively, only few products had been reimbursed. To introduce new technologies for improved patient centric treatment, novel value-based assessment and new pricing guideline of digital health medical devices are quite required.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The aim of this work was to perform a comparative analysis of the prevalence and clinical and laboratory features of the course of COVID-19 infection in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Methods. A retrospective analysis of 73 medical records of patients undergoing KRT and infected COVID-19 between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 54 hemodialysis (HD) patients, and the second group included 19 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Routine clinical and laboratory characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 depending on KRT modality were analysed. Results. The overall prevalence of COVID-19 was 37.63%. Mortality in this cohort of patients was 19.07%, and mortality associated with COVID-19 was 6.19%. Despite the predominance of COVID-19-associated morbidity in HD patients (46.55% vs. 24.36%, p = 0.05), mortality was not statistically significantly different between the studied groups (26.32% in PD patients vs. 12.96% in HD patients, p = 0.17). HD patients had more severe lung injury as measured by SpO2 (p=0.18) and CT (p=0.003), while PD patients had lower hemoglobin (p=0.001), platelet (p=0.001), total protein (p<0.001), and albumin (p<0.001) levels. A direct correlation was found between the percentage of lung injury according to the CT data and the leukocyte count in both the HD (r = 0.24) and PD (r = 0.56) groups. In addition, an inverse correlation between leukocyte and SpO2 values and between the percentage of lung injury according to the CT data and SpO2 indicators was found in the HD (r = -0.51 and r = -0.66) and PD (r = -0.47 and r = -0.63) groups, respectively. Conclusions. The results of our study are in complete agreement with published data and show the same COVID-19-associated mortality in HD and PD patients, with a statistically significantly higher prevalence of COVID-19 in HD patients. The course of COVID-19 in HD patients is characterized by more severe lung injury compared to PD patients, while PD patients had more pronounced anemia and significantly lower platelet, total protein, and blood albumin concentrations. © T. Yarmola, L. Tkachenko, H. Pustovoyt, S. Rustamian, V. Talash, Iu. Kostrikova, L. Miakinkova, O. Gutsalenko, 2023. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There are not enough data on the post-CO-VID-19 period for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients affected from COVID-19. We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory data of PD patients after COVID-19 with a control PD group. METHODS: This study, supported by the Turkish Society of Nephrology, is a national, multicenter retrospective case-control study involving adult PD patients with confirmed COVID-19, using data collected from April 21, 2021, to June 11, 2021. A control PD group was also formed from each PD unit, from patients with similar characteristics but without COVID-19. Patients in the active period of COVID-19 were not included. Data at the end of the first month and within the first 90 days, as well as other outcomes, including mortality, were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (COVID-19 group: 113, control group: 110) from 27 centers were included. The duration of PD in both groups was similar (median [IQR]: 3.0 [1.88-6.0] years and 3.0 [2.0-5.6]), but the patient age in the COVID-19 group was lower than that in the control group (50 [IQR: 40-57] years and 56 [IQR: 46-64] years, p < 0.001). PD characteristics and baseline laboratory data were similar in both groups, except serum albumin and hemoglobin levels on day 28, which were significantly lower in the COVID-19 group. In the COVID-19 group, respiratory symptoms, rehospitalization, lower respiratory tract infection, change in PD modality, UF failure, and hypervolemia were significantly higher on the 28th day. There was no significant difference in laboratory parameters at day 90. Only 1 (0.9%) patient in the COVID-19 group died within 90 days. There was no death in the control group. Respiratory symptoms, malnutrition, and hypervolemia were significantly higher at day 90 in the COVID-19 group. CONCLUSION: Mortality in the first 90 days after COVID-19 in PD patients with COVID-19 was not different from the control PD group. However, some patients continued to experience significant problems, especially respiratory system symptoms, malnutrition, and hypervolemia.
ABSTRACT
Background: End-stage renal disease is the last stage of chronic kidney disease and can affect the quality of life (QOL) of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life and examine its determinants. Methods: A cross-sectional survey involving patients on dialysis in a tertiary hospital was conducted from July 2020 to September 2020. Demographic data were collected using a predesigned questionnaire. QOL was measured using the 36-item KDQOL questionnaire, and statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 25. Results: Of the 108 patients, 59 were men and 49 were women, and the mean age was 48.15 ± 15.4 years. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the mean score of all components of health-related quality of life in different types of dialysis. The demographic data, which included age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, education level, occupation, and monthly income, did not significantly affect the QOL of dialysis patients. Patients with a dialysis duration of more than 5 years had a better QOL compared to other groups. Laboratory parameters such as low albumin and low hemoglobin showed a significant correlation with the health-related quality of life of dialysis patients. Conclusion: The quality of life among patients on dialysis was impaired, especially in terms of burden of the kidney disease. Hypoalbuminemia and anemia were the two factors that influenced QOL.
ABSTRACT
Intro: Kodamaea ohmeri, previously known as Pichia ohmeri, is an ascomycetous yeast that has emerged as an important cause of fungemia in immunocompromised patients. During the anamorphic stage this organism is also known as Candida guillermondii var. membranaefaciens. Method(s): We report five cases of Kodamaea ohmeri encountered from multicenter in Malaysia. Antifungal agent of choice will be discussed based on literature review. Finding(s): The cases were: (1) a contaminated peritoneal fluid in an adult patient on peritoneal dialysis;(2) a 60-year-old man with infected diabetic foot isolated K. ohmeri from a bone sample. Both cases discharged well without active antifungal fungal therapy. We observed fatality cases involving (3) an old man with underlying gastric adenocarcinoma who complicated with catheter- related bloodstream infection caused by K. ohmeri;(4) a patient with ventilator- associated pneumonia and septicaemic shock secondary to perforated terminal ileum;(5) and a severely ill COVID-19 stage 5b patient who passed away due to systemic fungaemia caused by K. ohmeri. Discussion(s): All three fatal cases received either amphotericin B or caspofungin as active antifungal agent. Literature evidence has shown that 40% of patient met demise despite on active antifungal agent, suggesting that currently no definitive antifungal agent proven to be a superior treatment option for K. ohmeri infection. Removal of indwelling medical device combined with antifungal therapy has favorable clinical outcome. Conclusion(s): Therefore, K. ohmeri infection in severely ill patients should be considered as a critical condition. Potential of alternative antifungal combinations need to be explored for an effective treatment option.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Calciphylaxis, otherwise known as calcium uremic arteriolopathy, is defined as calcium deposition around blood vessels in skin and fat tissue which occurs in 1-4% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Calcium deposition in the esophagus is extremely rare;to date, there have been only 4 cases reported worldwide. We report the fifth case of esophageal mucosal calcinosis occurring in a young male with ESRD. Case Description/Methods: A 37-year-old Thai man with ESRD on peritoneal dialysis since 2005 presented with generalized weakness and odynophagia due to oral ulcers, resulting in poor PO intake. He denied drinking alcohol, illicit drug use, or smoking. On exam his abdomen was soft, non-distended, non-tender, without any guarding. Past medical history included hypertension and COVID-19 in January 2022. Laboratory tests revealed neutropenia and pancytopenia, hyperphosphatemia, and hypocalcemia. EGD revealed distal esophageal esophagitis and hemorrhagic erosive gastropathy. Biopsy showed ulcerative esophagitis with dystrophic calcification, consistent with esophageal mucosal calcinosis .No intestinal metaplasia was noted. Immunohistochemistry was negative for CMV, HSV1, and HSV2. The patient was treated with pantoprazole 40mg IV every 12 hours, Magic Mouthwash 5ml qid, and Carafate 10mg qid. He was transferred to a cancer center where he had a bone marrow biopsy formed which was negative. His symptoms resolved and the patient was discharged to home (Figure). Discussion(s): Esophageal mucosal calcinosis is extremely rare. It is due to a combination of factors involving acidosis and the phenotypic differentiation (and apoptosis) of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) into chondrocytes or osteoblast-like cells. These changes, along with the passive accumulation of calcium and phosphate, induce calcification. Acidosis is well-known to promote inflammation of the arterial walls, releasing cytokines that induce vascular calcification. The benefits of treatment with sodium thiosulfate remain unclear. An ample collection of cases should help devise standardized treatment options and establish management guidelines for this condition.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the sociodemographic and psychological factors influencing the continuity of treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods A total of 277 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. 2020 to Mar. 2021 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: non-dialysis group (n=102), hemodialysis (HD) group (n=108), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=67). All patients were investigated by online and offline questionnaires, including self-designed basic situation questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The general sociodemographic data, anxiety and depression of the 3 groups were compared, and the influence of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the interruption or delay of treatment was analyzed by binary logistic regression model. Results There were significant differences in age distribution, marital status, occupation, medical insurance type, caregiver type, whether there was an urgent need for hospitalization and whether treatment was delayed or interrupted among the 3 groups (all P<0.05). The average SAS score of 65 PD patients was 38.15+/-15.83, including 53 (81.5%) patients without anxiety, 7 (10.8%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (7.7%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. The average SAS score of 104 patients in the HD group was 36.86+/-14.03, including 81 (77.9%) patients without anxiety, 18 (17.3%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (4.8%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. There were no significant differences in the mean score of SAS or anxiety severity grading between the 2 groups (both P>0.05). The mean SDS scores of 65 PD patients were 53.42+/-13.30, including 22 (33.8%) patients without depression, 21 (32.3%) patients with mild depression, and 22 (33.8%) patients with moderate to severe depression. The mean SDS scores of 104 patients in the HD group were 50.79+/-10.76, including 36 (34.6%) patients without depression, 56 (53.8%) patients with mild depression, and 12 (11.6%) patients with moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in mean SDS scores or depression severity grading between the 2 groups (both P>0.05). The results of intra-group comparison showed that the incidence and severity of depression were higher than those of anxiety in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education level (odds ratio [OR]=5.618, 95% confidence interval [CI]) 2.136-14.776, P<0.01), and unmarried (OR=6.916, 95% CI 1.441-33.185, P=0.016), divorced (OR= 5.588, 95% CI 1.442-21.664, P=0.013), urgent need for hospitalization (OR=8.655, 95% CI 3.847-19.476, P<0.01) could positively promote the continuity of treatment in maintenance dialysis patients under the regular epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. In the non-dialysis group, no sociodemographic and psychological factors were found to be associated with the interruption or delay of treatment (P>0.05). Conclusion Education, marital status, and urgent need for hospitalization are correlated with the continuity of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance dialysis.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is home-based dialysis therapy and therefore a suitable modality for kidney failure patients, particularly, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study examined patients' preferences for different PD-related services. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey study. Anonymized data from PD patients followed up at a single center in Singapore were collected using an online platform. The study focused on telehealth services, home visits, and monitoring of quality-of-life (QoL). RESULTS: A total of 78 PD patients responded to the survey. The majority of participants were Chinese (76%), married (73%), and between 45 and 65 years old (45%). The in-person visit was preferred over teleconsultation for consultation with nephrologists (68% versus 32%), counseling for kidney disease and dialysis by renal coordinators (59%), whereas the telehealth service was favored over in-person visit for dietary counseling (60%) and medication counseling (64%). Most participants (81%) preferred medication delivery over self-collection, and the acceptable turnaround time was 1 week. Sixty percent would like to have a regular home visit, but 23% refused such visits. The preferred frequency of home visits was one-to-three visits within the first 6 months (74%) and then 6 monthly for subsequent visits (40%). The majority of participants (87%) agreed with QoL monitoring, and the preferred frequency of monitoring varied between 6 monthly (45%) and yearly (40%). Participants also indicated three key areas in research to improve QoL, such as the development of artificial kidneys, portable PD devices, and simplification of PD procedure. Participants also would like to see improvement in two main areas of PD services, such as delivery service for PD solutions and social (instrumental, informational, and emotional) support. CONCLUSIONS: Most PD patients preferred in-person visits with nephrologists or renal coordinators; however, they favored telehealth services with dieticians and pharmacists. PD patients also welcomed home visit service and QoL monitoring. Future studies should confirm these findings.
ABSTRACT
In previous publications, we pointed out the importance of mannosylation of fibrinogen for the development of cardiovascular complications and fucosylation as a predictor of peritoneal membrane dysfunction in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). After a follow-up period of 30 months from the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we evaluated the significance of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) therapy, primary disease, biochemical and hematologic analyzes, and previously performed glycan analysis by lectin-based microarray as predictors of mortality in this patient group. After univariate Cox regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (DM) and calcitriol therapy were found to be potential predictors of mortality. Additional multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that only DM was a predictor of mortality. Nevertheless, the use of calcitriol in therapy significantly reduced mortality in this patient group, as shown by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The presence of DM as a concomitant disease proved to be a strong predictor of fatal outcome in PD patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. This is the first study to indicate the importance and beneficial effect of calcitriol therapy on survival in PD patients with COVID-19 infection. In addition, this study points to the possibility that adverse thrombogenic events observed in PD patients during the pandemic may be caused by aberrant fibrinogen glycosylation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemostatics , Peritoneal Dialysis , Humans , Calcitriol , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects , FibrinogenABSTRACT
Objective: The Turkish Society of Nephrology Registry collects data on hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and transplantation annually. Registry reports are printed every year as a booklet, and this is the 30th year of registry reports. Unlike previous years, registry reports include an additional chapter this year due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The effect and results of the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic on kidney replacement therapies are presented in the 2020 reports. Methods: We obtained data from the Turkish Society of Nephrology 2020 registry report and summarized the coronavirus disease-19-associated data and statistics for kidney replacement therapy patients. Results: The number of patients on kidney replacement therapy was 83 350 individuals at the end of 2020. A total of 1610 kidney replacement therapy patients were infected with SARS-CoV-2. Hemodialysis had the highest frequency of coronavirus disease 2019 (19.5%), followed by transplantation (12.2%) and peritoneal dialysis (8.6%). The mortality rate was highest in peritoneal dialysis patients with 29.6%, 24.4% in HD, and 11.2 % in kidney transplant recipients. Conclusion: Coronavirus disease 2019 has significant effects on the survey of patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy through severe complications.
ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has negatively impacted on patients of the whole CKD spectrum, causing high rates of morbi-mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines opened a new era, but patients with CKD (including kidney transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) were systematically excluded from pivotal clinical trials. The Spanish Society of Nephrology promoted the multicentric national SENCOVAC study aimed at assessing immunological responses after vaccination in patients with CKD. During the first year after vaccination, patients with non-dialysis CKD and those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis presented good anti-Spike antibody responses to vaccination, especially after receiving the third and fourth doses. However, kidney transplant recipients presented suboptimal responses after any vaccination schedule (initial, third and fourth dose). Especially worrisome is the situation of a patients with a persistently negative humoral response that do not seroconvert after boosters. In this regard, monoclonal antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for high-risk patients, although they may become obsolete as the viral genome evolves. The present report reviews the current status of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum with emphasis on lessons learned from the SENCOVAC study. Predictors of humoral response, including vaccination schedules and types of vaccines, as well as the integration of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents are discussed.
ABSTRACT
The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has been especially detrimental to patients with end-stage renal disease. History with other vaccines suggests that patients with renal disease may not respond adequately to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The aim of this study is to evaluate the immunity to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in renal patients. Post SARS-CoV-2 vaccination first, and after the booster dose, antibodies and cellular immunity were studied in patients on hemodialysis (N = 20), peritoneal dialysis (N = 10) and renal transplantation (N = 10). After the two doses of vaccine, there was an effective immunity in dialysis patients, with 100% seroconversion and 87% detection of cellular immunity (85% in hemodialysis and 90% in peritoneal dialysis). In contrast, in renal transplant recipients there was only 50% seroconversion and cellular immunity was detected in 30% of patients. After the booster dose, all dialysis patients achieved a cellular and antibody immunity, whereas in transplant patients, despite improvement, 20% did not produce antibodies and in 37.5% cellular immunity could not be detected. The mRNA vaccine plus booster performs excellently in dialysis patients, whereas in kidney transplant recipients, despite the booster, complete immunization is not achieved.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic forced our unit to alternate in-person consultations with telephone consultations, without this increasing urgent visits. Therefore, it seemed necessary to know the patient's opinion regarding this matter. Objective: To assess the satisfaction of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis with the quality of care received through a mixed model of in-person and teleconsultations. Material and Method: PA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between February and March 2021, using an anonymous telephone survey conducted by an independent interviewer. Inclusion criteria: aged over 18, receiving peritoneal dialysis, and giving their consent. Variables collected: age, sex, primary caregiver, provider (Baxter® / Fresenius® ), hospital admission (Yes/No). Satisfaction questionnaire (9 questions): 2 open-ended, 1 semi-closed with a dichotomous response and free text, and 6 closed with Likert-type response from 0-10. Results: Of the 78 peritoneal dialysis patients, 71 participants were included. 59.1% (n=42) were men, with an average age of 66.1 years (23.33-91.23 years). The average score for healthcare received through the mixed model of visits was 9.5 ±1.13. Regarding aspects to improve in phone consultations, 61.2% (n=41) considered it unnecessary to assign a specific time, 11.2% (n=8) stated the need to receive changes in writing, 4.5% (n=3) requested an improvement in the request for laboratory analysis at the healthcare center, and none considered video calls necessary. Conclusions: The patient's satisfaction with our mixed model of visits seems to reflect a good quality of care, subject to improvement and individualization. © 2023, Sociedad Espanola de Enfermeria Nefrologica. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic exerted complex pressures on the nephrology community. Despite multiple prior reviews on acute peritoneal dialysis during the pandemic, the effects of COVID-19 on maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients remain underexamined. This review synthesizes and reports findings from 29 total cases of chronic peritoneal dialysis patients with COVID-19, encompassing 3 case reports, 13 case series, and 13 cohort studies. When available, data for patients with COVID-19 on maintenance hemodialysis are also discussed. Finally, we present a chronological timeline of evidence regarding the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in spent peritoneal dialysate and explore trends in telehealth as they relate to peritoneal dialysis patients during the pandemic. We conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the efficacy, flexibility, and utility of peritoneal dialysis.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Peritoneal Dialysis , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Dialysis SolutionsABSTRACT
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is followed by alterations in adaptive immunity. The aim of this study was to evaluate B lymphocyte subtypes in ESRD patients before and after hemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CD5, CD27, BAFF, IgM and annexin were evaluated by flow cytometry on CD19+ cells in ESRD patients (n = 40), at time of initiating HD or CAPD (T0) and 6 months later (T6). RESULTS: A significant reduction in ESRD-T0 compared to controls was noticed for CD19+, 70.8 (46.5) vs. 171 (249), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD5-, 68.6 (43) vs. 168.9 (106), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD27-, 31.2 (22.1) vs. 59.7 (88.4), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD27+, 42.1 (63.6) vs. 84.3 (78.1), p = 0.002, CD19+BAFF+, 59.7 (37.8) vs. 127.9 (123.7), p < 0.0001 and CD19+IgM+ cells, 48.9 (42.8) vs. 112.5 (81.7) (K/µL), p < 0.0001. The ratio of early/late apoptotic B lymphocytes was reduced (16.8 (10.9) vs. 110 (25.4), p = 0.03). CD19+CD5+ cells were the only cell type with an increased proportion in ESRD-T0 patients (2.7 (3.7) vs. 0.6 (1.1), p < 0.0001). After 6 months on CAPD or HD, CD19+CD27-(%) and early apoptotic lymphocytes were reduced further. The HD patients also showed a significant increase in late apoptotic lymphocytes, from 1.2 (5.7) to 4.2 (7.2) K/mL, p = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: B cells and most of their subtypes were significantly reduced in ESRD-T0 patients compared to controls, the only exception being CD19+CD5+ cells. Apoptotic changes were prominent in ESRD-T0 patients and were exacerbated by HD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination is recommended for patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT), including hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KT). However, the difference in the immune response between RRT patients and healthy individuals after mRNA vaccines remains uncertain. METHODS: This retrospective observational study evaluated the anti-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibody acquisition, titers and their changes, normal response rate (reaching titers of healthy individuals), factors associated with a normal response, and effectiveness of booster vaccination in Japanese RRT patients. RESULTS: Most HD and PD patients acquired anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies after the second vaccination; however, their antibody titers and normal response rates (62-75%) were low compared with those of healthy subjects. Approximately 62% of KT recipients acquired antibodies, but the normal response rate was low (23%). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody waning occurred in the control, HD, and PD groups, while negative or very low titers remained in KT recipients. Third booster vaccination was effective in most HD and PD patients. However, the effect was mild in KT recipients - only 58% reached a normal response level. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that younger age, higher serum albumin level, and RRT other than KT were significantly associated with a normal response after the second vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: RRT patients, particularly KT recipients, exhibited poor vaccine responses. Booster vaccination would be beneficial for HD and PD patients; however, its effect in KT recipients was mild. Further COVID-19 vaccinations using the latest vaccine or alternative procedures should be considered in RRT patients.
ABSTRACT
Home dialysis modalities (home hemodialysis [HD] and peritoneal dialysis [PD]) are associated with greater patient autonomy and treatment satisfaction compared with in-center modalities, yet the level of home-dialysis use worldwide is low. Reasons for limited utilization are context-dependent, informed by local resources, dialysis costs, access to healthcare, health system policies, provider bias or preferences, cultural beliefs, individual lifestyle concerns, potential care-partner time, and financial burdens. In May 2021, KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) convened a controversies conference on home dialysis, focusing on how modality choice and distribution are determined and strategies to expand home-dialysis use. Participants recognized that expanding use of home dialysis within a given health system requires alignment of policy, fiscal resources, organizational structure, provider incentives, and accountability. Clinical outcomes across all dialysis modalities are largely similar, but for specific clinical measures, one modality may have advantages over another. Therefore, choice among available modalities is preference-sensitive, with consideration of quality of life, life goals, clinical characteristics, family or care-partner support, and living environment. Ideally, individuals, their care-partners, and their healthcare teams will employ shared decision-making in assessing initial and subsequent kidney failure treatment options. To meet this goal, iterative, high-quality education and support for healthcare professionals, patients, and care-partners are priorities. Everyone who faces dialysis should have access to home therapy. Facilitating universal access to home dialysis and expanding utilization requires alignment of policy considerations and resources at the dialysis-center level, with clear leadership from informed and motivated clinical teams.
Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic , Peritoneal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency , Humans , Hemodialysis, Home , Quality of Life , Renal Dialysis , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapyABSTRACT
Introduction: During armed conflicts dialysis patients may experience limitations or interruptions of therapy leading to severe life-threatening complications due to medical and logistical challenges. Before the Russian-Ukrainian war, there were approximately 10,000 adults requiring dialysis in Ukraine. Some patients decided to flee their place of residence and look for opportunities to continue dialysis in another location in Ukraine or abroad. To better understand the needs of conflict-affected kidney failure patients and to provide data which could support equitable and evidence-based prioritization of resources, the Renal Disaster Relief Task Force of the European Renal Association conducted a survey on distribution, preparedness and management of adults requiring dialysis displaced due to the war in Ukraine. Method(s): Cross-sectional online survey was conducted to assess the status of dialysis patients who were displaced across European countries since the beginning of the conflict in February 2022. The survey was sent to all national nephrology societies across Europe with a request to disseminate it to all dialysis centers in their countries. Data were collected between May and August 2022. Fresenius Medical Care (FMC) shared a limited set of aggregated data without direct center participation. Result(s): We received data on 602 patients (290 collected through the survey and 312 from FMC), who were dialyzed in 24 countries. Most patients were dialyzed in Poland (45.0%), followed by Slovakia (18.1%), Czech Republic (7.8%), Romania (6.3%), Germany (4.7%) and Hungary (3.5%). Most patients were originally dialyzed in Kyiv (north-central), Kharkiv (northeast), Odesa (southwest) and Zaporizhzhia (southeast). Before reaching the current reporting center, 34.6% of patients were treated in at least one other center since leaving their regular unit. Mean age was 48.1+/-13.4 years, 43.5% were females. Before patients left Ukraine, 95.7% had been on hemodialysis (HD), 2.5% on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 1.8% on automated PD. HD session frequency was reduced under war conditions in 23.5% of patients. Eighty-eight percent of HD patients had a patent arteriovenous fistula, 7.3% were HBs antigen positive, 16.1% had anti-HCV antibodies, 0.6% anti-HIV antibodies and 27.3% anti-HBc antibodies. In terms of patient preparedness for displacement, 63.9% carried medical records with them, 63.3% had a list of medications, 60.4% had medications themselves and 44.0% had a dialysis prescription. Overall, 26.1% of patients were admitted to the dialysis unit in the possession of all these factors while 16.1% presented with none. After leaving Ukraine, 33.9% of patients were hospitalized. Of the 88.5% of patients tested in the reporting center for COVID-19 1.9% was positive. Communication and language problems were reported by 43.8% of responding physicians. Conclusion(s): Up to the end of August 2022, less than 10% of Ukrainian dialysis patients decided to flee their country since the start of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and the majority of them chose as their place for dialysis a country neighboring Ukraine. Preparedness for displacement varied and was incomplete in most patients. Results from our survey may inform evidence-based policies and interventions to prepare for and respond to special needs of vulnerable kidney failure populations during armed conflicts and other emergencies. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe complication of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). kidney damage linked to COVID-19 could take on specific characteristics by genetic, environmental and socio-cultural factors. This study aims to evaluate incidence, risk factors and case-fatality rate of AKI in COVID-19 patients at Centre Medical de Kinshasa (CMK). Method(s): In a prospective cohort study carried out at the Kinshasa Medical Center (KMC), consecutive patients admitted to the ICU were screened for the presence of AKI from March 1st, 2020 to January 1st, 2022 period covered the first 4 waves of the Covid-19 pandemic. We included all adult inpatients (>=18 years old) with a positive COVID-19 PCR result. Patients on chronic dialysis (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) and those with less than two creatinine measurements were excluded. Aki was defined according KDIGO guidelines. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed by Cox regression to identify risk factors for AKI and association between AKI and in-hospital mortality. The significance level of p value was set at 0.05. Result(s): A total of 217 patients were included in the study of which most were males (77.0%) and blacks (80.2%). AKI was diagnosed in 63 out of 217 (29%) COVID-19 patients after a median time of 2 days (0-7). Stages 1, 2, or 3 AKI accounted for 39.7%, 11.1% and 49.2%, respectively. Hemodialysis was performed in 7.8% of the subjects and 69.8% of the survivors did not recover kidney function after AKI. Risk factors for kidney injury were first COVID-19 wave (HR: 3.1 [1.2-8.4] p=0.022), obesity (HR: 1.2 [1.02-6.7] p=0.046), higher SOFA score (HR: 6.1 [2.1-17.3] p=0.001) and CRP at day 7 (HR: 1.9 [1.1-10.0] p=0.023). Patients with AKI had a mortality rate of 57.1%. Adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed that COVID-19-associated AKI was independently associated with in-hospital death (HR:2.96 [1.93-4.65] p=0.013) compared to non-AKI patients. Conclusion(s): AKI was present in three out of ten COVID-19 patients. The most significant risk factors for AKI were first wave, obesity, higher SOFA score and CRP. Despite dialysis, AKI has been associated with almost threefold increase in overall mortality and seven out of ten survivors did not recover kidney function after AKI. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023